<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Negative Ads Backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/</link>
	<description>Conservative blogger and journalist with a passion for politics, sports and family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:39:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bluey Blog &#124; RobertBluey.com &#187; Why I Voted for Obama</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluey Blog &#124; RobertBluey.com &#187; Why I Voted for Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s partly for this reasoning that I decided to cast my vote for Barack Obama today. Although national polls give Obama a small advantage over John McCain in the general election, I firmly believe that McCain would handily defeat the inexperienced Obama. Secondly, I fear what the Clinton attack machine would do to McCain. Their ferocity would be worse than George W. Bush&#8217;s ugly attacks in 2000. Anyone who reads this blog regularly knows how much I dislike negative campaigns. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s partly for this reasoning that I decided to cast my vote for Barack Obama today. Although national polls give Obama a small advantage over John McCain in the general election, I firmly believe that McCain would handily defeat the inexperienced Obama. Secondly, I fear what the Clinton attack machine would do to McCain. Their ferocity would be worse than George W. Bush&#8217;s ugly attacks in 2000. Anyone who reads this blog regularly knows how much I dislike negative campaigns. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluey Blog &#124; Robert B. Bluey &#187; McCain 2.0 = Bush 1.0</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluey Blog &#124; Robert B. Bluey &#187; McCain 2.0 = Bush 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] what kind of a campaign McCain intends to run: one that&#8217;s full of negativity. It&#8217;s what turned me off last cycle when the Republican National Committee chose to engage in personal attacks instead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what kind of a campaign McCain intends to run: one that&#8217;s full of negativity. It&#8217;s what turned me off last cycle when the Republican National Committee chose to engage in personal attacks instead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bluey</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Vonnegut asks why it&#039;s &quot;important.&quot; I&#039;ll tell you why. Rick Klein&#039;s story is factually inaccurate. And even if the wrong number was dialed, Arcuri still expensed a phone-sex call to taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vonnegut asks why it&#8217;s &#8220;important.&#8221; I&#8217;ll tell you why. Rick Klein&#8217;s story is factually inaccurate. And even if the wrong number was dialed, Arcuri still expensed a phone-sex call to taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Politics Capitol Confidential : Albany Times Union : timesunion.com : Capitol confidential &#187; Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Politics Capitol Confidential : Albany Times Union : timesunion.com : Capitol confidential &#187; Odds And Ends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] an Oneida County Democrat, would just as soon forget, has resurfaced, along with something of a mea culpa from conservative blogger Robert Bluey, who laments GOP ads that backfired in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an Oneida County Democrat, would just as soon forget, has resurfaced, along with something of a mea culpa from conservative blogger Robert Bluey, who laments GOP ads that backfired in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bluey Blog</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bluey Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] Lewis takes me to task for my vow to &#8220;condemn negative ads, regardless of who runs them.&#8221; It warrants a brief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lewis takes me to task for my vow to &#8220;condemn negative ads, regardless of who runs them.&#8221; It warrants a brief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonnegut</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonnegut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/03/07/when-negative-ads-backfire/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>How in the world is it &quot;important&quot; that the next number dialed was for a calling card?  The 800-number WAS the same number as a number at the Division of Criminal Justice Services, with a 518 area code.

Clearly, what happened is that someone made a simple mistake and misdialed a state office number (thinking it was toll-free), realized the mistake, and then called the proper (non-toll-free) number using a calling card.

It&#039;s amazing to me that even after the drubbing that the Republicans rightfully took on this negative ad, you don&#039;t address the central problem with it -- IT WAS HORRIBLY FALSE.

Any reasonable inquiry would have uncovered that fact.  Indeed, the very fact that it was a 1-minute, $1.25 call would make someone with any ethics pause before basing an ad on it.

But not the Republicans....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world is it &#8220;important&#8221; that the next number dialed was for a calling card?  The 800-number WAS the same number as a number at the Division of Criminal Justice Services, with a 518 area code.</p>
<p>Clearly, what happened is that someone made a simple mistake and misdialed a state office number (thinking it was toll-free), realized the mistake, and then called the proper (non-toll-free) number using a calling card.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me that even after the drubbing that the Republicans rightfully took on this negative ad, you don&#8217;t address the central problem with it &#8212; IT WAS HORRIBLY FALSE.</p>
<p>Any reasonable inquiry would have uncovered that fact.  Indeed, the very fact that it was a 1-minute, $1.25 call would make someone with any ethics pause before basing an ad on it.</p>
<p>But not the Republicans&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
