04 May, 2007

In Defense of QubeTV

Posted by: Rob Bluey In: Conservatism| Technology



Jeff Lord of QubeTV, originally uploaded by Rob Bluey.

David All doesn’t like QubeTV. And for that matter, he’d just assume be done with Conservapedia, too. David and I probably agree 98% of the time, but this is one time we’re on opposite ends of the spectrum.

David’s criticism of QubeTV centers on the notion that it’s a conservative alternative to YouTube, a point that was punctuated by Eric Pfeiffer’s Washington Times article Tuesday. (It’s in the news again today; this ABC News story is linked on the Drudge Report.) While some people, including QubeTV founders Charlie Gerow and Jeff Lord, may think that QubeTV is a viable alternative, there’s simply no way this site will ever rival YouTube in traffic. Jeff Lord pretty much acknowledged that when he spoke at the Heritage Foundation last month. Rather, he seemed perfectly content with users cross-posting their videos on multiple sites. He knows he’s filling a nich√© market.

Lord is following in the footsteps of many an entrepreneur before him — trying filling a void in the market. David Livingston is attempting to do the same thing at Capitol Hill Broadcasting Network, another video sharing site that caters to the congressional crowd. Are either of these sites harming either constituency? I’d argue that they’re actually advancing people’s understanding of web video. If you want to reach a nich√© market, you post to those site. If you want viral marketing, you turn to YouTube. Let the market decide winners and losers, my friend.

My colleagues at the Heritage Foundation, a strong advocate of the free market, have embraced as many video-sharing sites as possible to market our Heritage in Focus videos. The last time I checked, we post them to 15 sites: Blip.tv, Broadcaster.com, Capitol Hill Broadcasting Network, Daily Motion, Eyespot, Grouper Video, GUBA, Jumpcut, QubeTV, Sharkle, Veoh Video Network, Vimeo, vSocial, Yahoo! Video, and YouTube.

Two months ago, David lauded Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards for his devotion to 24 social-networking sites. Using that same logic, you’d think he’d embrace these 15 video-sharing sites, even if some reach a nich√© audience.

Conservatives shouldn’t be ashamed of trying new things, but they also shouldn’t abandon the existing infrastructure. Anyone who has asked me about QubeTV, including CNN’s Jacki Schechner, has gotten that advice. I haven’t heard a compelling argument to the contrary.

4 Responses to "In Defense of QubeTV"

1 | Sean Hackbarth

May 5th, 2007 at 11:59 pm

Avatar

From my limited experience at QubeTV I found I couldn’t embed any video. I’m more likely to pass on videos on my weblog than wander to the sites finding stuff. So no embedding means I won’t be using it.

2 | Matt N.

May 6th, 2007 at 9:35 am

Avatar

Yes, I also didn’t see any way to embed video from QubeTV. And from their disclaimer, they don’t seem to have the expensive, high-octane hosting system which a video hosting service requires. With the type of open source software out there, anyone and their brother could create and host their own version of youtube. (See http://www.flashinsider.com/2006/07/26/how-to-create-your-own-youtube-site/) But the trick is to have millions of dollars of start up capital and actually make money in the process- Google and YouTube are far from actually make a profit, and they have the best servers in the world and almost unlimited resources at their disposal.

QubeTV is a good idea if it hosts the type of videos about radical Islam that youtube takes down. But between bandwidth and hosting costs, copyright issues, a lack of advertisements, and no embedding, It appears QubeTV needs to get a better business model asap- Unless they just have so many donors that they simply don’t care.

And nothing is wrong with hosting a conservative wiki. However, because of the number of actual volunteer man hours a comprehensive wiki involves, I don’t see how they could ever come close to the 1.7 million articles that wikipedia hosts. I think it would be more interesting if they became a constantly-updated online companion to ISI’s encyclopedia of conservatism. And volunteers could still branch out into the type of articles they write about now, but there wouldn’t be any illusion that its somehow everything wikipedia is… just with a conservative slant.

3 | Jonathan Rick

May 6th, 2007 at 12:39 pm

Avatar

While Heritage and Edwards’s campaign have the resources to post to 15 and 24 sites, respectively, individual people, who vlog and connect not as a job but as a hobby, simply don’t have that kind of time.

Another practical consideration: say you make a typo. You then need to correct it on every site you’ve uploaded to.

Finally, I prefer the alternative David proposes: rather than create a competitor to YouTube, start a blog dedicated to the given niche. The resources necessary are far smaller, the task is far easier, and the project is far easier to promote.

BTW, a suggestion for you, Rob: I think the comments box should be bigger, so that people can see more of what they’re typing as they type it.

4 | Bluey Blog | Robert B. Bluey » Teaching Taxpayers How to Blog

June 16th, 2007 at 11:26 am

Avatar

[...] with my good friend Andy Roth of the Club for Growth and Charlie Gerow of QubeTV, the YouTube-link video site for conservatives. I’ll be talking about why the blogosphere matters and how state and local can’t start [...]

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Flickr PhotoStream

  • Inside the House of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasTexas School Book Depository

BlueyTube


FriendFeed

Just saw two helicopters flying over Thurmont, MD. I wonder if the Obamas are visiting Camp David?

Wednesday 17:33

@rorycooper Thanks for hosting the Bloggers Briefing today. I heard it went well. Appreciate your help! #tbb

Wednesday 17:33

Interesting political ad on a Massachusetts gas pump. http://yfrog.com/179wij

Wednesday 17:33

@Gundisalvus has an excellent commentary on Sotomayor and racial identity politics. Highly recommend. http://bit.ly/wBowV

Wednesday 17:33

I blame Obama for all this road work. Stupid stimulus. http://yfrog.com/0jxxtbj

Wednesday 17:33

What idiot decided it was a good idea to do road work on the George Washington Parkway midday Friday? http://yfrog.com/15rsjj

Wednesday 17:33

@MelissaTweets Nope, I'm in Atlanta. Don't think there's a Chick-fil-A at Reagan.

Wednesday 17:33

Took a detour to terminal A. Nothing is better than a Chick-fil-A chicken biscuit for breakfast. http://yfrog.com/0vgjyj

Wednesday 17:33

Great event tonight in Atlanta. Made even better by two friends who attended: @ewerickson and @estherclark. Thanks for coming out!

Wednesday 17:33