28 Jun, 2007

House Republicans Choose Money Over Majority

Posted by: Rob Bluey In: Capitol Hill

Just when House Republicans started to regain the trust of conservatives on fiscal restraint, they decided to team up with Democrats to vote themselves a $4,400 pay raise. It’s almost laughable, but in Washington it’s business as usual.

For starters, the notion that members of Congress deserve a pay raise is just remarkable in itself. Just 19% of Americans think Congress doing a good or excellent job, a pretty clear sign that the average Joe wouldn’t support boosting congressional pay to nearly $170,000. Do a better job, and then you can get a raise.

Yet when the vote came up yesterday, 99 Republicans joined 145 Democrats to approve the pay hike. Nearly the entire House Republican leadership was complicit.

Supporters of the pay increase argue that it’s a cost-of-living adjustment that’s no different from what other government workers get each year. They also argue that some members aren’t wealthy and are forced to sleep in their office or make other personal sacrifices.

I’m not buying it. One of those members we’re supposed to feel sorry for is freshman Rep. Tim Walberg (R.-Mich.), a true fiscal conservative. Walberg actually sleeps in his office, and based on his vote against the pay raise yesterday, doesn’t appear to have a problem with it. “Michigan is in an economic recession and its leaders need to be making sacrifices to bring the Wolverine state back to prosperity,” said spokesman Matt Lahr. “The Congressman has been outspoken about making tax relief permanent and felt it would be inconsistent to vote to increase his own pay.”

Another critic of the pay raise, Rep. Jeff Flake (R.-Ariz.), doesn‚Äôt believe it’s appropriate for members of Congress to receive pay raises while the federal government is running deficits, according to his spokesman.

The issue is a contentious one for both parties. After attacking Republicans in several campaigns last year, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D.-Ill.) wasn’t eager to have a showdown over the pay raise. John Bresnahan of the Politico thinks the GOP now has an issue to use against Democrats. I don’t see why it would be. Republicans had just as much of a role in this as their counterparts. Shame on them.

10 Responses to "House Republicans Choose Money Over Majority"

1 | I Want My Cost of Living Raise Too

June 28th, 2007 at 11:59 am

Avatar

[...] anyone?), this is so disingenuous that even fellow conservatives don’t buy it. Conservative Robert B. Bluey, of the aptly named Bluey Blog, chimes in with some good advice conservatives should pay attention [...]

2 | Light

June 28th, 2007 at 2:42 pm

Avatar

I think we need a law put in place where members of congress that ARE wealthy or already have a substantial income, say double that of stated congressional pay, would be required to forfeit it. These people already have their own money, what do they need ours for? Those congress members that don’t already earn twice what the pay would be, could receive it if they wish.

I think we should also press each of our members of congress to forfeit their pay altogether, especially those Republicans. If any did this, it would be a true sign of solidarity with the people. Especially if they’ve already got fat pockets, large houses, and expensive cars.

3 | Jo macDougal

June 28th, 2007 at 5:17 pm

Avatar

It just shows how the GOP has become America’s 2nd left wing party. It has been taken over by the born again New Dealers.
America needs another party.

4 | Rod Stanton

June 28th, 2007 at 7:26 pm

Avatar

It is hard for me to accept haw far to the left Bush has moved the GOP in 6.5 years. But here is just more proof of how lberal Republicans are today.
Americans are still conservaives. Our 2 big Parties are just liberal. Hence the low ratings for both Congress and GWB(the liberal I voted for in 04).

5 | The Warrior Class Blog » Transparency and Appearances

June 28th, 2007 at 8:08 pm

Avatar

[...] their vote when they realized that the bill was going to fail. Meanwhile, while no one was looking, the House voted a pay raise, even the Republicans who claim to be against such things. Those Republicans calculated that this was safe because no one [...]

6 | 170k ain't that much

June 28th, 2007 at 9:44 pm

Avatar

First year associates at big law firms in Chicago, NY, LA, and DC make $160k this year. That is, you go to a decent law school (top 15? top 25?), do decently (B+ average?), and in three years you’ll have a JD and be making $160k/year the first year, $180k the second, $205k the third, $225k the fourth, $240k the fifth, etc…

Just by way of comparison. Keep in mind most of these people are lawyers, so they’re actually giving up a stack of cash to be in Congress. That’s the reality.

You get the Congress you pay for.

p.s. I can’t imagine what a law firm or a lobbying firm would pay to employ a former Congressperson. A half a million? More? And the Congresspeople know this with specificity and give up the stacks of cash anyway.

7 | Kev

June 29th, 2007 at 1:22 am

Avatar

They shouldn’t be voting on their own pay raises in the first place; perhaps we should be doing that. Anything that knocks down the ivory tower that is the Beltway and requires them to live a life that’s more in touch with the people they claim to represent would be a good thing.

8 | Mike Turney

June 29th, 2007 at 7:26 pm

Avatar

It’s a Government of the people (us) for the people (them). It sucks to say it, but there’s absolutely nothing that can be done about it.

9 | Cd1234567891

July 2nd, 2007 at 3:05 pm

Avatar

(IMO) it is fiscal irresponsibility to increase Congress’ pay at a time when the US Government is spending billions and billions of dollars on war, and has a stratospheric budget deficit.

The battle is not over. The Senate also has to act. Further, on 6/29/07, U.S. Rep. Harry Mitchell [D, Arizona] introduced legislation that would block the automatic pay raise (bill number not yet assigned).

The House voting record in favor of no debate on the automatic pay raise (H.Res.517) can be found at http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll580.xml .

Email your House representative and Senators to let them know:

No more pay increases for Congress until the War is OVER.

10 | KatyDidlt

July 16th, 2007 at 6:14 pm

Avatar

Perhaps we, the people, should decide whether or not our elected leaders deserve a raise, state by state. And I don’t care how much cash they gave up from their legal careers to pursue a political one. That was their decision and I’m tired of paying for it.

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Flickr PhotoStream

  • Inside the House of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasTexas School Book Depository

BlueyTube


FriendFeed

Where is the best place in D.C. to watch the fireworks? The @Heritage rooftop, of course. http://yfrog.com/5ae36xj

Wednesday 17:33

Just saw two helicopters flying over Thurmont, MD. I wonder if the Obamas are visiting Camp David?

Wednesday 17:33

@rorycooper Thanks for hosting the Bloggers Briefing today. I heard it went well. Appreciate your help! #tbb

Wednesday 17:33

Interesting political ad on a Massachusetts gas pump. http://yfrog.com/179wij

Wednesday 17:33

@Gundisalvus has an excellent commentary on Sotomayor and racial identity politics. Highly recommend. http://bit.ly/wBowV

Wednesday 17:33

I blame Obama for all this road work. Stupid stimulus. http://yfrog.com/0jxxtbj

Wednesday 17:33

What idiot decided it was a good idea to do road work on the George Washington Parkway midday Friday? http://yfrog.com/15rsjj

Wednesday 17:33

@MelissaTweets Nope, I'm in Atlanta. Don't think there's a Chick-fil-A at Reagan.

Wednesday 17:33

Took a detour to terminal A. Nothing is better than a Chick-fil-A chicken biscuit for breakfast. http://yfrog.com/0vgjyj

Wednesday 17:33