07 Aug, 2007

Closing the Book on YearlyKos

Posted by: Rob Bluey In: Clippings| Politics



Presidential Leadership Forum, originally uploaded by MNicoleM.

Next year there will be no YearlyKos Convention. It’s being renamed Netroots Nation, a term organizers feel is more appropriate for their burgeoning movement. It also illustrates the realization of liberal activists that they must move beyond Bush bashing on blogs like DailyKos to a longer-term vision about their beliefs.

I’ve withheld commenting about YearlyKos over the past few days because I wasn’t there to see it firsthand. But I’ve read enough about it that I feel it deserves another mention on my blog.

For starters, check out Patrick Ruffini’s post from last week about the leaky pipes in the rightosphere. An excellent piece by one of our best thinkers. Here’s an excerpt:

My co-blogger Hugh Hewitt refers to the “lead pipes” of the left-wing blogosphere that are slowly but surely contaminating the groundwater in the Democratic Party. But if their pipes are dirty, ours are leaky and badly in need of an overhaul. (At least if one wants to do more than just pass along positive information about the war.)

It would be one thing if we didn’t have any of these institutions, and could start from scratch just as the netroots did. My fear is that we have a bunch of institutions that still function somewhat well, but are long past their prime. With that, there is the danger we will slowly die without knowing it, as our techniques gradually lose effectiveness year after year. Just like newspaper circulation numbers. And there are a number of people on the right who are still complacent about this.

Mark Tapscott weighed in with his two cents. And I was quoted by Jose Antonio Vargas on the Washington Post’s Trail blog and by Lisa De Pasquale on Townhall about how the left copied the right, and why we shouldn’t try to mimic YearlyKos.

But that was all before the conference got under way. Now that it’s over, I would direct you to a few pieces that offer some interesting analysis about what took place, but more importantly, what it means for conservatives. Amanda Carpenter writes at Townhall that “the extreme left has grown into an organized, radical 21st century online force, more interested in raising taxes to fund universal broadband than donning hippy headbands.” (It should also be noted that it’s mostly a white male army.)

Soren Dayton responds to Amanda’s article with this spot-on analysis:

The left thought that it was a broad-based movement that covered the entire Democratic coalition. Nope. It really was just a bunch of recent college grads and late boomers. The statistics were right. Mid-forties, kids, $90k, white, etc. Somehow a project created by these guys didn’t have broadbased appeal. Who woulda thunk?

These individuals have been motivated by their hatred for President Bush and pretty much everyone who subscribes to conservative principles. Soren’s right that their movement “is self-conscious enough to know that it has to evolve,” but it’s anyone’s guess where it will go from here.

But for conservatives, the picture is clearer. More from Soren:

For the right, the lesson is that this isn’t just about technology. It is also about actual constituencies and voters and activists. The power of the (second generation, as opposed to the FreeRepublic generation, of the) online right won’t really come together until we find either a new set of people we can activate either financially or on the ground. (the netroots has done both) This will probably take an idea. (the netroots had partisanship and Bush-hating, which are not long-term, but effective in the short-term, and they might yet come out with policy ideas attached to the New Democratic Network)

It’s not an easy problem to solve, and one that will not take shape until after the 2008 presidential election when Hillary Clinton is preparing to be sworn in as president. Remember, the first rise of the online right (Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily, NewsMax, Cybercast News Service, etc.) came about during President Bill Cinton’s tenure in office. Another Clinton presidency would take a steep toll on our nation, but it would almost certainly serve as the motivation necessary for the right to advance online.

6 Responses to "Closing the Book on YearlyKos"

1 | Bart Bartleson

August 7th, 2007 at 12:29 pm

Avatar

“These individuals have been motivated by their hatred for President Bush and pretty much everyone who subscribes to conservative principles.”

Garbage. Flawed premises lead to flawed conclusions. Perhaps the riding roughshod over law, reason, the Constitution, etc. might have had something to do with it. “Hate,” is the province of the Right. Or haven’t you been reading?

2 | Rob Bluey

August 7th, 2007 at 2:57 pm

Avatar

You’re right, we do “hate” the terrorists. But frankly, you’d have a hard time convincing me to like anyone who wants to kill me.

No doubt there are people on the right who harbor hateful feelings, but in my experience the online left is much more focused on personal attacks. Again, I’m speaking from my own personal observations.

3 | Patrick Ruffini :: When Does Movement 2.0 Get Started?

August 7th, 2007 at 3:59 pm

Avatar

[...] Coming on the heels of the YouTube debate fight, YearlyKos has sparked a lively conversation on the right about what needs to be done to reinvigorate our movement online. The leading lights on this are Mark Tapscott, Soren Dayton, Amanda Carpenter, and Robert Bluey. [...]

4 | Bluey Blog | Robert B. Bluey » A Busy Afternoon on Internet Radio

August 8th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

Avatar

[...] Hunter of Americans for Tax Reform and Amanda Carpenter of Townhall about YearlyKos. I offered these thoughts about it yesterday. (Click here to [...]

5 | Bluey Blog | Robert B. Bluey » We Have the Eyeballs, Just Not the Activism

August 14th, 2007 at 10:04 pm

Avatar

[...] Their piece appears in Politico and quotes extensively from a Patrick Ruffini blog post that I linked last week. Here’s an excerpt from Rasiej and Sifry’s op-ed: What all this means is [...]

6 | Bluey Blog | Robert B. Bluey » Let’s Stop Fawning Over the Netroots

September 4th, 2007 at 10:59 pm

Avatar

[...] Dean Barnett writes in the Weekly Standard about the “Lopsided Netroots,” an analysis of why there’s no YearlyKos on the right. It’s a question that Mark Tapscott and Patrick Ruffini addressed last month, and one I remarked on more than once. [...]

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Flickr PhotoStream

  • Inside the House of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasHouse of Blues DallasTexas School Book Depository

BlueyTube


FriendFeed

Just saw two helicopters flying over Thurmont, MD. I wonder if the Obamas are visiting Camp David?

Wednesday 17:33

@rorycooper Thanks for hosting the Bloggers Briefing today. I heard it went well. Appreciate your help! #tbb

Wednesday 17:33

Interesting political ad on a Massachusetts gas pump. http://yfrog.com/179wij

Wednesday 17:33

@Gundisalvus has an excellent commentary on Sotomayor and racial identity politics. Highly recommend. http://bit.ly/wBowV

Wednesday 17:33

I blame Obama for all this road work. Stupid stimulus. http://yfrog.com/0jxxtbj

Wednesday 17:33

What idiot decided it was a good idea to do road work on the George Washington Parkway midday Friday? http://yfrog.com/15rsjj

Wednesday 17:33

@MelissaTweets Nope, I'm in Atlanta. Don't think there's a Chick-fil-A at Reagan.

Wednesday 17:33

Took a detour to terminal A. Nothing is better than a Chick-fil-A chicken biscuit for breakfast. http://yfrog.com/0vgjyj

Wednesday 17:33

Great event tonight in Atlanta. Made even better by two friends who attended: @ewerickson and @estherclark. Thanks for coming out!

Wednesday 17:33