<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Quid Pro Quo for Romney&#8217;s Gift to Heritage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/</link>
	<description>Conservative blogger and journalist with a passion for politics, sports and family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:39:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bluey</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re confusing partisanship (Republican) with ideology (conservatism). We&#039;re quite proud to stand on the side of freedom as conservatives.

However, for anyone, including the Boston Globe, to insinuate that we&#039;re campaigning for Republicans is completely ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing partisanship (Republican) with ideology (conservatism). We&#8217;re quite proud to stand on the side of freedom as conservatives.</p>
<p>However, for anyone, including the Boston Globe, to insinuate that we&#8217;re campaigning for Republicans is completely ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bluey</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Back up that assertion with some facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back up that assertion with some facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BR/GL</title>
		<link>http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>BR/GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertbluey.com/blog/2007/11/20/no-quid-pro-quo-for-romneys-gift-to-heritage/#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>I, too, doubt that Paul Weyrich could be bought for only $10K.  The Heritage Foundation may be incorporated as a nonprofit, but is hardly nonpartisan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, doubt that Paul Weyrich could be bought for only $10K.  The Heritage Foundation may be incorporated as a nonprofit, but is hardly nonpartisan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
